Difference between AND and ALL in advanced flows

[Gary_Lane]

Hi all,

Can someone please explain the difference between using:

1. two conditions separated by AND

Logic A → AND → Logic B → THEN action

and

2. two conditions combined with an ALL

   Logic A }
   … … … … } → ALL → THEN action
   Logic B }

I am using the second option in an advanced flow and it doesn’t fire when both Logic A and Logic B are true

[Jo_San]

If the all does not go through than either one of the cards before it is not true, or they are never activated (the path to such a card isn’t there, or at least not at the same time).
But, without showing the flow, it would become a guessing party I’m afraid.

[Dijker]

Please share a screenshot of your flow.

[Gary_Lane]

Yes, when both variables are “Yes”, the action following the ALL block does not fire. The flow is ENABLED

Is there a difference between the two constructs in my original post?

[Gary_Lane]

I had imagined that when both the conditions were met, DOORBELL 2 would be activated. It isn’t

[Jo_San]

You are using and cards as trigger cards, that does not work

[Gary_Lane]

Ah, I think I see. So I would need to change it to this?

[Gary_Lane]

Or would this work as the more elegant solution?

[Arie_J_Godschalk]

This still will not work, you need a trigger as start of any line.
The image above, where you connect the If and And cards, that one looks good.

[Jo_San]

This should work I think

[Jo_San]

This won’t, as the AND cards do not get triggered.

[Jo_San]

If you want to use the ALL card, you could connect the trigger to both AND cards.

[Gary_Lane]

OK all, got it. Thanks so much for your help. It seems either the daisy-chained ANDs or this ALL block would work equally. Please just let me know if I’;ve got that wrong. This has ben a great education, thank you.