Hey! I think there’s been a bit of confusion. Homey never officially announced a partnership with Reolink. We only mentioned that we’re in touch with their team, which is why the status was set to “negotiating”.
Since we haven’t heard from them in a while, I’ll update the status to “Waiting on manufacturer” to make that clearer. Appreciate the feedback!
Hey, appreciate you checking in! No updates just yet; if there were, I’d have shared them already. Like I mention in other threads, I always post updates as soon as there’s news, so I kindly ask to keep the “Any updates?” posts to a minimum. It helps keep my inbox manageable and makes sure I can focus on getting actual updates to you guys faster
Totally understand how frustrating it is that your Reolink devices aren’t working with Homey right now. And hey, if you’ve got thoughts on how I should handle updates (or even non-updates like this), I’m all ears! Just not much new to share at the moment.
That said, one thing worth noting: Reolink recently became an official Home Assistant partner and seems to be opening up a bit more with their APIs. Hopefully, that’s a good sign for us too!
We’ve been in contact with the Reolink team, and they’ve expressed strong interest in integrating with the Homey platform. For now, they’re waiting on camera stream support to be finalized, so there aren’t any concrete updates yet. These things take time, but stay tuned!
So I’ve just found out from other threads that Homey has had a working proof of concept regarding camera streams for getting close to six months now.
This is really great news and I can’t wait to see what you have in store. However, it’s now pretty obvious that Reolink must have been waiting quite a while for this to be finished off, before they commit to creating an official app.
For a long time now, you’ve kept up this weird kind of smoke and mirrors act that in fact it’s Athom that has been waiting for Reolink to get behind the table. It’s just comical to watch.
I can understand that these things take time and that partnerships are delicate to develop and nurture. In respect of this, would it not make more sense for the partnerships manager to simply focus on securing and developing partnerships, rather than being the consumer facing narrative of how everything is communicated with Homey users?
All of this stuff should just be left to the marketing and customer support department to communicate news in a clear and transparent fashion, when it is appropriate to do so.
With respect, the current way things are communicated to the forum, is so frustrating.
I totally understand the frustration, it really does take time to get these things moving. As Partnerships Manager, my full focus is on bringing these partners onto the platform, and I want to be transparent with you about how things are (or aren’t) progressing.
The reality is that it’s not as simple as telling Reolink: “Build an integration and be happy with it.” These partnerships only work if they’re mutually beneficial, for the brand, for us, and for you as the end users.
Sometimes it’s a quick “let’s just do it” from a brand, but other times it has to go through multiple layers of approval before a decision can be made. That’s just the nature of working with large companies.
I didn’t need a stock Chat GPT response, what I needed was some acceptance that your messaging has been inconsistent, inaccurate and that you’ll review the internal processes around ‘announcing’ partnerships.
In my view, partnerships should not even be announced as in the ‘negotiating’ stage. They should only be announced when an app is in active development and there is a clear and plausible roadmap for delivery to consumers.
Anything short of that is nothing more than rumour and speculation and to consumers looks to be being used (either by design or by incompetence) to lure in new customers on the promise of new features.
That is really, really poor customer service from a company that I generally hold in high regard in many other areas.