Athom wins lawsuit against Chinese Athom Tech and AliExpress

Source: Tweakers (Dutch)
Article translated with Deepl:

Athom Holding B.V. and Athom B.V. have won summary proceedings for trademark infringement. China’s Athom Technology and sales platform AliExpress International Netherlands must stop selling infringing Athom products, according to the preliminary ruling.

The court in The Hague ruled on Nov. 12 that China’s Athom Technology and the Dutch branch of AliExpress are committing trademark infringement against Athom, the company behind the Homey smarthome platform. The indicted companies were not present at the trial and the court therefore granted default to Athom Tech and AliExpress NL. In summary proceedings, the court makes a preliminary ruling; the parties may still initiate proceedings on the merits or appeal.

The Chinese company “Athom Tech” sold smarthome products just like Athom until recently, but has to stop doing so for the time being by a European Union-wide court. The company may no longer use the names “Athom” and “Athom smart home” in connection with the importation, promotion, online offering and marketing of smarthome products or similar products. AliExpress is also banned from selling these products.

In addition, Athom Tech is required to take back all products sold within the entire European Union to “professional buyers and distribution locations” and refund the purchase price and shipping costs. The company has two weeks to do this.

In any case, both companies must reimburse Athom’s litigation costs, which amount to over 15,800 euros per company. In addition, the companies risk a fine of 5,000 euros per day or 2,000 euros per product with a maximum of 300,000 euros if they continue to sell the trademark-infringing products. Athom Tech may also face a similar penalty if the return of all relevant products sold is not carried out.

Reaction Athom

Athom co-founder and Commercial Director Stefan Witkamp says in a statement to Tweakers that he is pleased with the judge’s ruling. He explains, “We have known about the Chinese party Athom Technology since 2022. They suddenly started selling smarthome products under the same name years after us. We challenged the company on that and initially they were sympathetic, but in the end nothing changed.”

Witkamp cannot say how much sales Athom has lost due to the trademark infringement, but does speak of image damage: “We regularly saw complaints in comments under reviews of our products about poor return policies and lack of customer service, but that was about Chinese Athom, not about us. In addition, our customer service was occasionally contacted about products that were not ours.”

According to the Dutch company, both Athom Technology and AliExpress have failed to honor previous removal requests. Athom says it has yet to submit requests to the latter webshop to have individual products removed; the Chinese webshop is said to be ‘hiding behind Athom Technology’s trademark’ application. Indeed, according to Witkamp, Athom Technology did file an official European trademark application for the brand name, but did not receive it because of the agreement with the Dutch company.

7 Likes

The fact you never knew Homey was produced by the company named Athom does not make it right that another company uses the same name and tries to benefit from it, and that’s what this case was about.

It’s interesting though that (Dutch) Athom seems to have trademarked their name in 2020, which is also the year that (Chinese) Athom was founded.

1 Like

Well yeah, but I think we also know Athom was founded in 2015 and the company was registered in the Netherlands at that time. Knowing it was a startup by students at that time doesn’t make it hard to understand they didn’t trademark the name at that time. May raise questions, but their presence as a legal company with the name Athom in the Smart Home industry based in the Netherlands but not limited to the Dutch (or European) market, isn’t debatable.

What I find debatable is that (Chinese) Athom will have picked their company name to benefit from (Dutch) Athom’s name. I don’t think that’s the case, it’s merely a coincidence. But since (Dutch) Athom trademarked their name and (Chinese) Athom didn’t, (Dutch) Athom can make a case.

1 Like

Well it wouldn’t be the first rip off by a Chinese company :wink:
Thing is, the performance of the Chinese Athom could rub off on Dutch Athom, users of Chinese Athom with problems might be contacting the wrong Athom taking away resources to be spent on ‘our’ problems.

The products work great and they use Tasmota/WLED/ESPHome… Those communities support these. Whatever you want to call them, I’m happy to buy them.

Good for you, I’m sure you’ll be able to keep buying them under a different brand name pretty soon.

1 Like

Or the other way around, when Dutch Athom users start complaining about the abysmal performance of their Homey devices to the Chinese Athom support desk :face_with_peeking_eye:

2 Likes

It seems kind of silly to me to say that when it’s unclear whether the Chinese company will change its name. There is often very little that can be done to change the behavior of a company in China as they do not have reciprocity with Western countries. What is clear as it has been started officially is that homey will be LG thinq…

1 Like

Think of it what you like and speculate all you will, I’m not spending anymore time on first time posters here with a one side and misinformed view on this subject.

1 Like

You may do as you like, but everyone has “one sided” views. I’m not sure how the quantity of posts i have made has any relationship with the discussion, I think that you simply don’t like that what I have said is true. It’s sad that you felt the need to abusively report my replies as spam despite never having broken the rules here. It’s like you don’t want people of all perspectives to interact with the community here if they don’t align with what you think. If homey wasn’t closed source, maybe the performance issues being mentioned here would be resolved, I didn’t see you responding about that part, and that was something that was not posted by a “first time” poster… Maybe you are being selective about the responses that you give to only respond to those you feel you can smother and extinguish. If anything I think that makes you the one who has broken the rules so perhaps you should be flagging your own replies rather than mine.

Ok, so, I will respond one more time, just to state a fact:

No I did NOT flag your posts, that’s your assumption and misjudgement. Please don’t accuse me of anything if you have no proof for it.

1 Like

I apologize if I was mistaken about that. I’m sure you could see how that’s a conclusion I might reach

I’m sure that they would try to help, they have always been helpful to me in reaching out