Z-wave associations are a very important feature for 2 main reasons: Buttons can send commands directly to light bulbs, so if Homey isn’t working the lights can still be controlled. Dimming works way better using buttons (e.g. by long press).Gradual dimming using flows is slow, uneven and unrespon…

PARTLY solved, Thanks @TagePP for the tip. I created and tested an app that was insprired on the previous Walli workaround. This app will allow you to add other z-wave devices unsecure using your temporary fix. I do not expect Athom to accept this in their store, but it is available in the community…

Yesssss! by entering a bad PIN (eg: 00000) during inclusion, the Fibaro “Roller Shutter3” is not in: “S2 Authenticated” but in unsecured mode !!! so I can create flows with Zwave: “send raw command”. Many thanks to @Da_JoJo for suggesting this workaround by entering the wrong PIN code

Glad that worked. For the S2(unauthenticated) it’s not an option though. I haven’t looked at the driver-code , but is there a possibility to change the inclusion of S2(unauthenticated) to force S2(authenticated) and do the same security code trick ?

I have tried the new code with both “requireSecure”: true and false, changes nothing for my device (sunricher rebranded K8 remote)

I tried it too, same result. You can only enforce secure for locks or similar, ut not force uncecure. As secure is the default that seems hardly useful. That would only be relevant if S2 inclusion failed and unsecure was attempted because S2 failed. Would have been great if false meant insecure, t…

Associations are made completely useless after 7.0. Had a bunch of fibaro dimmers with direct associations to namron switches, and it worked all fine (and still does after 7.0). Just refurbished a bedroom, bought a dimmer and switch to but no Sir, not this time. I want the direct association to wor…

Any feedback from Athom regarding this issue yet? Or maybe someone has come up with a working hack?

[image] Ryvaenge: “requireSecure”: true and false, changes nothing In SDK:2 “drivers\fgbs-222\driver.compose.json” , I found the next part: "includeSecure": false, "learnmode": { "image": "{{driverAssetsPath}}/learnmode.svg", "instruction": { "en": "Press the bu…

IncludeSecure is the “old” tag to prevent S0 security. Sadly it was not used to apply to S2 security.

I’m new to Homey and this sort of protocols, but could it be possible to do a raw configuration to change the security parameters? [image]

I’ve checked the manual for the dimmer and I see now that there is not any such secuity configurations listed, but was thinking that there might be more configurations available than specified in the manual…? [image]

[REQUEST] User selectable Z-wave security levels in order for associations to work

Ideas & Suggestions

TagePP November 27, 2021, 10:16pm 36

Remove the line: “includeSecure”: false,
Add the line: “security”: [“none”],
Test, and let me know

[APP][Pro] UnZ-Cure (add z-wave devices unsecure)

Topic		Replies	Views
[APP][Pro] UnZ-Cure (add z-wave devices unsecure) Apps app , z-wave , tools , devices , homey-pro	43	6158	January 7, 2025
Add Z-Wave device non-secure? Questions & Help z-wave	51	13135	April 20, 2022
Assoziationen zwischen Z-Wave Geräten einrichten Geräte z-wave	36	4575	January 31, 2026
Popp outdoor plug problems, unsecure inclusion? Devices z-wave	8	1447	July 30, 2021
Das Dilemma mit dem Z-Wave Sicherheitsstandards seit Firmware 7.0.0 🇩🇪 Deutsch (German) z-wave , security	2	593	July 31, 2021

[REQUEST] User selectable Z-wave security levels in order for associations to work

Related topics