# Change "is turned on" to "is on" for cards in the And part of a flow

**URL:** https://community.homey.app/t/change-is-turned-on-to-is-on-for-cards-in-the-and-part-of-a-flow/48065
**Category:** Ideas & Suggestions
**Created:** [June 2, 2021, 3:12pm UTC](https://community.homey.app/t/change-is-turned-on-to-is-on-for-cards-in-the-and-part-of-a-flow/48065 "2021-06-02T15:12:03Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![K\_S](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex025/user_avatar/community.homey.app/k_s/32/11635_2.png) [@K\_S](https://community.homey.app/u/K_S)
#### Post date: [June 2, 2021, 3:12pm UTC](https://community.homey.app/t/change-is-turned-on-to-is-on-for-cards-in-the-and-part-of-a-flow/48065/1 "2021-06-02T15:12:03Z")

</div>

It’s confusing if you add a card to the “And” section of a flow if the card says [Device] “is turned on”. That implies [in English] that the And criterion is a device is switched from the off state to the on state, not that the device is already on. That would be a second trigger

It would be less confusing [and better English] to have the card say  
[Device] “is on” or  
[Device] “is already on” or (for split infinitive pedants),  
[Device] “is on already”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JPe4619](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex025/user_avatar/community.homey.app/jpe4619/32/9017_2.png) [@JPe4619](https://community.homey.app/u/JPe4619)
#### Post date: [June 2, 2021, 3:18pm UTC](https://community.homey.app/t/change-is-turned-on-to-is-on-for-cards-in-the-and-part-of-a-flow/48065/2 "2021-06-02T15:18:58Z")

</div>

Who cares? If it’s turned on, you don’t have to turn it on again. And when a device is turned on, it’s not a garantee that it is on, only for Homey the status is on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![K\_S](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex025/user_avatar/community.homey.app/k_s/32/11635_2.png) [@K\_S](https://community.homey.app/u/K_S)
#### Post date: [June 2, 2021, 4:44pm UTC](https://community.homey.app/t/change-is-turned-on-to-is-on-for-cards-in-the-and-part-of-a-flow/48065/3 "2021-06-02T16:44:40Z")

</div>

I care. And so should developers.

It’s confusing enough as it is to get flows to work they way you think they should, let alone be hindered with poor semantics / mis-translations.

As written, its wrong. It is written as one time event, when in fact it should be written as a status.

It’s a significantly different scenario to say…  
“When this trigger happens AND this trigger happens [at the same time]”, than to say…  
“When this trigger happens and the status of a device is this”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Edwin\_D](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex025/user_avatar/community.homey.app/edwin_d/32/136417_2.png) [@Edwin\_D](https://community.homey.app/u/Edwin_D)
#### Post date: [June 2, 2021, 4:53pm UTC](https://community.homey.app/t/change-is-turned-on-to-is-on-for-cards-in-the-and-part-of-a-flow/48065/4 "2021-06-02T16:53:46Z")

</div>

You are Dutch, so if I translate it to “Wordt aangezet” you probably understand the situation a bit better. The intricacies of the English language are a lot less apparent in Dutch, so I deliberately chose the wording to show the conflict. “Is aangezet” is the easiest Dutch translation, but that is used in multiple ways. For us that could have happened a while back, in English it could not.

Now just hope my English is correct. I am Dutch too, so forgive me if I messed up. 🙂
